Module 3
Understanding the results


Go Back to the Main Menu

1. The Summary window

This window displays a summary of the results of the current scans, including:

  • Code symbology and decoded number
  • Results from plugin data content analysis features
  • Average bar gain,
  • Overall ISO/ANSI grade,
  • Wide-to-narrow ratio (where applicable)
  • X dimension and magnification
  • Check characters
  • The dimensions of the light margins
  • The measuring aperture

The example below, shows the Command and the Summary windows of the 7th scan out of a 10 scan average. Click here to download the scan file.

Comments:
1/ There are two columns on the window. This is because when you verify a barcode, you can choose to average the grade over several scans (up to 10) of the same barcode. When you do so, the result for each scan is displayed in the right column (This Scan) and the average result is displayed in the left column. From the Command window you can prompt any scan to browse through the individual scan results of the right column.

2/ The Average Bar Gain is a measure of the average deviation of bars from the ideal dimensions. For each bar, we calculate the difference between its actual width (as measured by the verifier) and the ideal width (as specified in the symbology standard), then we average over the whole barcode. A positive value means that the bars are, on average, thicker than they should be by the percentage displayed. A negative value means that the bars are, on average, too thin.
The ideal situation would be to have 0% variation. However, there is a certain amount of tolerance allowed, which varies depending on code symbology and size. The tolerance is shown in brackets next to the percentage, it refers to the "traditional analysis" method. For EAN/UPC barcodes, the smaller the barcode, the lower is the tolerance. It is important to realise that the average bar growth is not one of the ISO/ANSI parameters, however it can affect a number of these parameters (mainly Modulation and Decodability). You could have a situation where the ABG is out of the tolerances (there will be a red flag), however, the ISO grade is within standards (green flag). This would mean that the barcode fails the traditional analysis but passes the ISO/ANSI analysis.

3/ Depending on the type of symbol scanned, the information displayed in the third line will change.
- EAN/UPC: Magnification, narrow bar width
in microns.
- ITF-14: Wide to Narrow ratio, narrow bar width
in microns, magnification
- EAN/UCC-128: Narrow bar width
in microns, magnification.
- code 39: Wide to Narrow Ratio and the X dimension in microns

4/ The Check Character row can be confusing in the following scenario. If you are scanning a code 39, as the check character is not mandatory for this symbology the verifier could end up looking for a check character that does not exist and indicate this as an error in the check character row of the Summary window. To avoid this, you can deactivate the check character verification for 3 specific symbologies: Code 39, ITF and Codabar. This is done in the Check Character tab of the Set Up - note that it is activated by default). This possible confusion does not affect symbologies such as ITF-14, EAN-13 or EAN-128, for which the check character is compulsory and will always be checked by your Axicon verifier.

5/ The quiet zones (aka light margins) are checked for conformance to the application standard. In the left column, the scans in the green areas are those where the light margin was good, those in the red (In the example scan 6, 7, 8 and 9 on the right margin) are scans where the quiet zone was not wide enough. In the right column, the quiet zone size will be indicated for failing scans. For good scans the width of the quiet zone is not indicated.

6/ The aperture will set itself automatically according to the size of the barcode reference bar width and to the relevant application standard. If scanning a barcode with the wrong aperture (generally because the relevant aperture is not available on the readhead used, like when you scan an EAN-13 with an Axicon 7000 series) then the colour coding will be orange instead of green. More information to follow on the notion of aperture.

7/ The "Structure Window" can be displayed by clicking on the structure field in the Summary window. If there is no structure error then the structure window will be empty. If there is a structure error, highlighted by a red flag of the structure field of the summary screen, then the type of error will be displayed in the structure window. The types of errors can be: Sub Optimal Packing (see comment 8 below) or Element Determination Failed...

8/ Case where the error message "Sub Optimal Packing" appears in the structure window when verifying a Code 128 barcode (including GS1-128). This structural error in the code is caused because the recommended method of encoding this data has not been followed and as a result the bar code contains many more bars than it needs to. We call this error 'Sub-optimal packing' and although it does not directly affect the print quality (it may indirectly if the size of the bars has needed to be reduced to encode the extra bars), it is displayed as an error because the data has not been encoded according to the specification in the Code 128 standard.

Click here to download the scan file - Please find analysis below
With the Code 128 bar code symbology a method of encoding two numeric digits in the same space as would normally be used for alpha characters is available, but instead of using the 'compressed' encoding method, the numeric digits in this sample bar code are encoded individually. We can ignore this error if we are happy with the size of the bar code we have created as it is certainly graded A which is very good, but if the encoding software or artwork can be set into the appropriate mode to create the correct optimal packing, then this structural error would also disappear and the bar code would be significantly shorter in length (or could be printed at the same overall length but with larger bars, which can often result in better scanning performance).

2. The Reflectance Profile

2-1: The Reflectance Profile

The principle behind the decoding of a barcode by a scanner is fairly simple to understand. It relies on the measure of the reflectance values of the printed barcode along the path of the scan line. A light is emitted by the scanner LEDs, this light is then reflected by the material on which the barcode is printed and by the ink used to print the barcode, and the amount of reflected light (also called "reflectance") is measured by the photo sensitive captors located in the read head, as the scanning aperture moves across the scan line .

The reflectance profile is a graphic representation of the reflectance values measured along the scanned surface. In the examples below, the vertical axis expresses the percentage of reflected light (Percentage of emitted light that is actually reflected) and the horizontal axis represents the width of the scanned area. In the reflectance window of the Axicon verifier software, you can choose to tick the "Display Static Reflectance" option and this will let you display the reflectance values measured along the capture width of the verifier even when no barcode has been scanned or detected. This can be useful to establish the relevance of some material for printing barcodes (See the comment section for more information).

When projected on a light coloured material (in the example below, white) most of the light tends to be reflected, so the reflectance profile would look like this:

When projected on a dark material (dark blue, dark brown, black) the light tends to be absorbed and very little light gets reflected. The reflectance profile would then look like this:

If we now scan a surface that is light on the left half and dark on the right half, the reflectance profile would have this shape:

Naturally, on a barcode, i.e. a succession of dark and light elements, the profile looks as follows:

On the above reflectance profile of a barcode, the peaks represent the high reflectance elements, i.e. the light spaces and the valleys represent the low reflectance elements, the dark bars. We can see on both extremities the light margins. We can identify in the profile peaks and valleys of different width matching the spaces and bars of different width in the barcode.

In the reflectance profile window*, you can actually view the behaviour of the reflectance profile on a 2 module width on both sides of the barcode, outside the minimal light margin requirements. In the example below, we can notice that on the left quiet zone, the reflectance value drops rapidly just outside the minimal width required for the left margin, which on this EAN-13 barcode is 11 modules. 


*As of version 2.0.20.1 of the Axicon verifier software (click here to access the download page)

 

2-2: Rmin, Rmax, Global Threshold, Decode Algorithm

In the Axicon verifier software, on the reflectance profile of the barcode, only the area that represents the barcode is actually displayed, i.e. the barcode plus the left and right light margins. The red horizontal line represents the highest value of reflectance measured on the barcode, also called "Rmax". The green horizontal line represents the lowest value of reflectance measured on the barcode, also called "Rmin". The blue line also called the Global Threshold is set as the middle value between Rmax and Rmin. Areas above the Global Threshold are treated as spaces and those below it as bars. For the detailed parameter analysis, each element edge position is determined, not where the profile crosses the Global Threshold, but where it passes through the reflectance value midway between the peak reflectance of the adjoining space and the lowest reflectance of the adjoining bar (or vice versa). 

Once the edge position of each element has been worked out, the dimensions of all the bars and spaces can be established and subsequently, the numeric code represented by the barcode can be decoded, using the symbology decode algorithm.

Comments:

1/ If the peak reflectance value of an element does not go over (for a light space) or under (for a dark bar) the global threshold, the code will be assigned a decode grade of 0 with a reason "Element Determination Failure". This shows well on the example below, where many peaks do not reach over the global threshold. As a result the global threshold is moved to a new value to allow some further analysis. See a more detailed explanation below.
Click here to download the scan file

When a bar code is to be verified it is vital as a first step to determine which elements are bars and which are spaces. This is done by establishing a Global Threshold reflectance value which is the mid-point of the maximum and minimum reflectance values of the scan reflectance profile for the bar code. Having determined this threshold, the profile is then examined with all areas above the threshold being considered space elements and all those below the threshold being considered bar elements. With the bars and spaces being defined in this way, the symbol should still decode correctly, but if it does not and the reason is because one of the elements is not correctly defined by the global threshold, then the symbol will be considered to fail with the reason for failure being an Element Determination error.

Bar codes with this problem are not uncommon, particularly on packaging substrates that are either partially transparent to the incident light or on highly gloss surface substrates. Scanners will often still correctly decode such symbols even though the elements cannot be correctly determined by the method described above using the Global Threshold. This is because most, if not all, scanners would not use a global threshold to determine the elements of the bar code. Different scanner manufacturers will employ different ways of determining element edges, but a convenient way of seeing how bar codes with this type of error can be decoded, is with a threshold which can move from the global threshold position to a different position where the elements are correctly determined to allow a valid decode of the symbol.

When a bar code fails with an Element Determination error, the verifier will show a 'Used Threshold' value that does give correct element determination on the scan reflectance profile and the value of this threshold will also be displayed on the Detail Window. A bar code with this type of problem will have a poor modulation grade and it will be graded F because of the element determination error. The ISO verification standard does not require any further analysis once the element determination has been established, but it can be useful to proceed with an analysis despite the failing grade for this symbol as it is then possible to see what the other parameters for the symbol to discover whether there are any other errors in the printing of this bar code, such as with the dimensional accuracy which is measured by the decodability parameter.

2/ Using the verifier with the static reflectance display box ticked can be very useful to check the variation of reflectance between two colours on a surface you intend to use for the background of a bar code. Even without printing an actual barcode, if you scan an area using the dark colour on the material, the software will display the maximum and minimum reflectances of the scanned area. The Symbol Contrast between them is shown in the bottom left corner of the window, as a percentage and as a CEN/ANSI grade. This allows you to determine whether the contrast between your chosen colours is great enough for them to be used for the bars and spaces of a bar code. 

The static reflectance will also be helpful to understand what might be the problem of a barcode you are having trouble decoding. By studying the peaks and troughs shown you may be able to determine why the code cannot be read, e.g. if there is no light margin, or if the code is suffering from severe bar gain/loss.

3/ Decoding a barcode: We have seen in this chapter how a barcode reader works to decode all sorts of linear barcodes. Then we have approached the optical arrangement, scanning light and apertures required when using a verifier with the purpose of capturing an ISO grading of a barcode print quality. On a reasonably well printed barcode, decoding the barcode should not be an issue. On a substandard barcode it can be difficult, using a verifier, to decode a barcode There could easily be a belief amongst users of such equipment that a barcode verifier should be performing better than a mere scanner to decode a barcode, but this is, in fact, quite the opposite as scanners function on the same principle (the interpretation of the reflectance profile) but have more latitude to use all sorts of robust decoding algorithms or different optical arrangements than the ones specified by the standard. Also, a reader is only performing a decode hence requires a lot less processing time than a verifier that needs to extract a lot more information.

4/  Tips: If a barcode does not read and you can't obtain a verification report

There are several possibilities. First, make sure that the verifier is being properly used and try again at a different height from the barcode, to ensure that the scanning line "catches" the barcode. If it still fails to decode, then it means that the barcode is defective. Please note that even if there is no read, you can still display the reflectance profile by clicking the relevant box at the top of the reflectance profile screen. This will provide the reflectance values of the symbol and some good indications as to where the problem might have occured. CASE STUDY. Barcodes printed on film often present problems. The usual problems occur when:

  • The material is non opaque. The scanning light goes through and does not reflect properly to the unit. In this case, scan the symbol on top of a black background and also scan it on top of a white background and retain the worst result. Alternatively, in the case of a packaging that has not been filled, if you know the colour of the product (eg:creams, lotions,..) use this colour for the background.
  • The material is shiny. The reflexion is distorted and gives an inaccurate perception of the dimensions. 
  • The barcode is printed on a film layer stuck on top of an opaque packaging: If the barcode is printed under the film, the scanning light has to go through a thickness of film before it reaches the barcode and there is a double effect of refraction and reflection of the light. The barcode is printed on top of the film, but the light that goes through is then caught by the bars when it goes back through the symbol after being reflected. The consequence is that a verifier (hence any scanner) will have an exaggerated perception of the dimension of the bars that will give a poor decodability grading.


2-3: Optical arrangement

The ISO standards set out a reference optical arrangement as per the figure below, consisting of a source of flood incident light at 45° to the surface and a collector (through an aperture) of the diffusely reflected component of this light, at right angles to the surface. The vertical plane in which the light source is located is parallel with the height of the bars. This set-up is intended to minimise the effect of specular (mirror-like) reflection from glossy surfaces.

2-4: Scanning light

The light source and/or collector are chosen so that the peak wavelength of the measured light is the same as will be used in the scanning application for which the symbols are intended. Most scanners use red light. The Axicon verifiers use a 660 nm wavelength of light.  This is in accordance with the Genspec standards (670+/-10) 

Unwanted light falling on the symbol under test is a frequent cause of otherwise apparently inexplicable variances in verification results. The Axicon verifiers have been designed is such a way that the optical head is fully shielded from light from external sources and to ensure verification is done regardless of the ambient lighting conditions. This ensures a better consistency in the verification results.  

2-5: Measuring aperture

The diameter of the measuring aperture relative to the width of the bars is very important. If the aperture is too small, it means that small imperfections have a much greater impact on the scan reflectance profile than they need, in the worst case scenario, a simple defect could be mistaken for an actual bar. So the use of a smaller aperture than specified may lower a symbol’s "defect" grade. It might also improve the modulation. 

If the aperture is too large compared to the width of a narrow element, the aperture cannot “see” the bar edges as clearly as it should (and hence cannot measure the width of bars and spaces accurately), this kind of adjustment reduces the edge contrast and the modulation. It might improve a bar code symbol’s defect grade. 
 
Only the use of the correct aperture for the X dimension of the symbol under test will ensure that the grade established is correct. 

For barcodes used with the general distribution of products, the application standards will specify the scanning aperture for the relevant symbologies. The GS1 General Specifications clearly establish (in Chapter 5 Section 4) what aperture should be used and when. See the summary table below. 

GS1 General Specifications Verifying Aperture Requirements

Symbology Aperture in mils Aperture in microns 
EAN/UPC* 06 150
GS1-128 10 250
ITF-14, X < 0.635 mm 10 250
ITF-14, X ≥ 0.635 mm 20 500
                                   * EAN-8, EAN-13, UPC-E and UPC-A 
 

When the barcode scanned is not coded in one of the above symbologies, then the Genspec do not apply and the choice of the scanning aperture can be made on the basis of the table below :

ISO 15416-1 - Guideline for diametre of the measuring aperture

X dimension in mm Aperture in mils ApertuRe in microns 
0.100 X < 0.180 mm 03 75
0.180 X < 0.330 mm 05 125
0.330 X < 0.635 mm 10 250
 X ≥ 0.635 mm 20 500


Comments:

1/ The Axicon verifier software will automatically set the scanning aperture to the aperture required by the application standard or by the ISO standard otherwise. Provided that the aperture is available on the verifier used. The Axicon 6000 & 6500 series have all the required apertures for GS1 symbologies. The Axicon 7000 series cannot scan at a 6 mils aperture, so if you verify say, an EAN-13 barcode, with an Axicon 7000 series verifier, the aperture will set itself to the minimum 8 mils value available on this equipment and in the summary screen, the following message will be displayed in the aperture row.


3. How the ISO grading works

3-1: The weakest link

The ISO grading method consists of grading the print quality of a barcode from the best possible grade: 4 (or A) to the worst possible grade 0 (or F).

To work out the overall grade, for each scan, a total of 7 parametres are taken into account and each graded individually. These seven parametres are: Rmin, Symbol Contrast, Minimum Edge Contrast, Modulation, Decodability, Defects and Decode. The lowest of the seven grades (the weakest link of the chain) becomes the ISO grade of the scan. Obviously, as it is recommended when verifying a given barcode to average over several scans, the overall grade is the average value of the ISO grades measured for each scan. The Axicon software calculates and displays automatically the overall scan.

3-2: Tables

3-2-1: ISO parametres grading table

Grade Rmin Symbol Contrast Minimum Edge Contrast Modulation Defects Decodability
A (4) <0.5 Rmax ≥70% ≥15% ≥70% ≤15% ≥62%
B (3)   ≥55%   ≥60% ≤20% ≥50%
C (2)   ≥40%   ≥50% ≤25% ≥37%
D (1)   ≥20%   ≥40% ≤30% ≥25%
F (0) ≥0.5 Rmax <20% <15% <40% >30% <25%

3-2-2:correspondance between alphabetic and numeric grades

Numeric Alphabetic
 3.5 ≤ grade 4 A
2.5 ≤ grade <3.5 B
1.5 ≤ grade <2.5 C
0.5 ≤ grade <1.5 D
0 ≤ grade <0.5 F

Comments:

1/ The grade displayed in the

3-3: How many scans should we average on ?

It is recommended to scan the barcode at different heights and average the results in order to give a more accurate overall grading. You can set the software to average up to 10 scans of the same barcode. The ISO 15416 standard in its chapter 5.2.5 recommends a minimum of ten scans, but the number of scans may be reduced in order to simplify the process of assessment of a large numbers of symbols. The standard, in Annex J2, refers to a methodology based on results achieved on previous print runs of the same symbol. The amount to average over goes from 2 scans to 10 scans as the code goes from a consistently good barcode to a consistently defective barcode. 

Tip: Averaging is about consistency of the grading throughout the height of the barcode. Take 3 scans of the barcode: one at the top, one in the middle and one at the bottom. If the results are good (A or B) and very consistent (same grade each scan) then a 3 scans average is enough, if the result are not so good (C, D or F) and not so consistent (1 grade difference) then go for a 5 scan average, if the results are not consistent (results with 2 grade difference or more) then go for a 10 scan average.

However, our experience shows that many companies specify a 10 scan average verification in their barcode quality control guidelines, so the 10 scan approach should be favoured in case of doubt.


Comments:
1/ On a multi scan average, you can get a situation where the worst grade for the average results of the 7 grading parametres is in fact different to the overall grade, this is because the overall grade is not the worst of the average value of the 7 parametres, but the average value of the general grade of each of the N scans

2/ Because the light wavelength at which measurements are made and the diameter of the aperture used are important attributes of the symbol quality grade, they must also always be reported with it. The format specified for reporting the print quality grade, for example 1.5/06/670,  includes respectively the overall symbol grade (in this case 1.5), the aperture reference number in mils (in this case 6 mils) and the light wavelength (in this case 670 nm).


4. The Detail window - the 7 ISO parameters

Comments:
1/ The example scan shows the details of an averaged set of scans. This particular example illustrates a point which can often lead to confusion because the average of the overall grades is actually lower than the average grade of any of the individual parameters. In this particular instance it is because both symbol contrast and modulation have been less than perfect on some of the individual scans. Four of the individual scans have achieved an overall grade of 2.0 and two of them have achieved 3.0, the resulting overall grade for the symbol is therefore 2.3 when these six values are averaged. Download the following scan file to see the individual scans that produced this example.
Click here to download the scan file

4-1: The MINIMUM REFLECTANCE (Rmin) Parameter

Definition:
This is the least amount of reflectance recorded by the scanner. This is usually achieved from the darkest bar. Ideally the bar would be so dark that it would absorb all of the light and therefore reflect no light back . As a less dense ink is used, or an ink of a lighter colour, a higher percentage of reflectance is measured, therefore moving away from the ideal. This is a Pass/Fail grade. If Rmin is greater than half the value of Rmax, it will be assigned a grade of 0 (F). Otherwise the grade is 4(A).

Potential causes of problems:
The cause of Rmin being too high is that the colour of the bars is too light. Colours such as red, orange or yellows should be banned for printing the bars of a barcode.
Solutions: Change bar colour for one with a lower reflectance, increase ink weight or print head temperature (thermal printing) N.B. watch for consequential increase in bar widths.

Case Study:
This diagram shows the reflectance profile of the 4 barcodes, all scanned in a row as they are shown below. On the three barcodes starting from the left, the colours chosen for the bars (Red, Yellow and orange) do not allow us to see any distinction between the reflectance of the bars and the reflectance of the spaces. The last barcode on the right, with black bars on a white background gives an excellent contrast shown in the matching part of the reflectance profile*.

* Should you be watching at this diagram on the black and white printed version of this document, then the above will not make much sense to you. This case study is relevant only if seen on a coulour version.

Comments:
1/ Since we are aiming to achieve the lowest possible reflectance, increasing the density of a gloss black ink could become counter-productive. A better result might be achieved by either using a more matt black ink, or by reducing the density of the ink if a gloss black needs to be used.

2/ the Maximum reflectance value (RMax) is also displayed in the Detail screen, but this is not one of the ISO parametres. Rmax is the highest reflectance recorded by the scanner i.e. from the background. From an ideal white space this would be approx 90%. If the background is of a different colour e.g. on a cardboard box, this level reduces from the ideal providing a lower percentage. Although Rmax is not itself one of the ISO/ANSI parameters, it is used to calculate the symbol contrast parameter (see below).  

3/ Likewise the Global Threshold (Threshold) value is displayed in the Details Screen. This is not one of the ISO/ANSI parameters either. 


4-2: The SYMBOL CONTRAST Parameter

Definition:
The Symbol Contrast is the difference between the highest and the lowest reflectance values in the profile, i.e. the difference between Rmax and Rmin. SC = Rmax - Rmin. The maximum reflectance (Rmax) may occur anywhere, in a space or a Quiet Zone. The minimum value (Rmin) will always be in a bar. The importance of this parameter is that the higher the Symbol Contrast, the more easily distinguishable from each other the bars and spaces will be, so, ideally, this difference in percentage will be very high. As the difference between the reflectance in bars and spaces falls so will the percentage, and therefore the grade. 

Potential causes of problems:
• Background too dark. Solutions: Use lighter or less glossy material or change background colour (if printed) to one with higher reflectance 
• Showthrough of contents. Solutions: Use more opaque material for package, or print opaque white underlay prior to printing symbol 
• Bars too light. Solutions: Change bar colour for one with lower reflectance.

Definition:
Please read comment in section 2.2 on how to use the static reflectance profile to test the likely Symbol Contrast grade of an Ink/Substrate configuration.

Case Studies:

The images below show three examples of reflectance profiles, from very good, to very bad. At the top, black bars on a plain white background, this is ideal and the contrast is at 83% and has a grade A. The middle barcode is typical of a dark packaging where a layer of white has been applied to offer a light background but the layer is too thin and its reflectance does not exceed 35%. The Symbol Contrast at 32% is graded D. The bottom sample is just not scanable as the background appears as brown/gold which is absolutely inappropriate. We can just about see the shape of a barcode on the reflectance profile, however the Rmax is at about 10% hence an extremely poor contrast. Note that in both case studies where the contrast is failing, the Rmin value is good, it is the Rmax value that is at the origin of the problem, but we could obviously have a case where the background is fine but the value of Rmin too high to ensure a good contrast. Please click on the relevant link to download the Scan file and open it with the Axicon Verifier software. 
  

Click here to download the scan file

Click here to download the scan file

Click here to download the scan file


4-3: The MINIMUM EDGE CONTRAST Parameter

Definition:
The Edge Contrast is defined as the difference between the highest and lowest reflectance values in a pair of adjacent elements (bar + space or space + bar). Quiet zones are considered spaces for this purpose.The lowest difference found anywhere in the barcode is recorded as the Minimum Edge Contrast (ECmin). This is a Pass/Fail grade. If the minimum edge contrast is less than 15%, the verifier will give a grade 0 (F) otherwise the grade wil be 4(A).

Potential causes of problems:
The Minimum Edge Contrast as such is very rarely identified as the unique failing parametre of a barcode. However the ECmin value is used in the calculation of the Modulation parametre. So please refer to the Modulation parametres for potential causes of problems as they will be closely linked.


4-4: The MODULATION Parameter

Definition:
This parameter is related to the previous one, and is a measure of the Minimum Edge Contrast as a proportion of the Symbol Contrast. Low Modulation values will be caused by the same factors as low Edge Contrast. The difference is that Modulation relates Edge Contrast to Symbol Contrast: MOD = ECmin/SC. A low Edge Contrast value carries a greater risk of causing poor reading results when Symbol Contrast is high than the same Edge Contrast value has when Symbol Contrast is low. The Modulation, is graded from A to F, with a grade F being achieved when the Minimum Edge Contrast difference is lower than 40% of the main Symbol Contrast. This indicates the parts of the code where the scanner is most likely to miss a bar to space transition and therefore fail to read.

Potential causes of problems:
• showthrough of contents. Solutions: Use more opaque material for package, or print opaque white underlay prior to printing symbol 
• local variations in background reflectance, e.g. fragments of darker material in a recycled material. Solution: use a more consistent substrate or one with higher reflectance 
• local variations in inking of the bars Solution: adjust press settings to ensure even or darker inking 
• element(s) adjoining the edge in question appear excessively narrow relative to the measuring aperture used. Solutions: increase X dimension; ensure correct measuring aperture is used; apply correct bar width adjustment when originating symbol; print bars marginally narrower than spaces of same modular dimension 

Case Studies:
The example below is probably the most frequent case of poor Modulation, ie the case of a barcode printed on a see through flexible material. In the example below, we took a picture of the sample placed on top of the printed words "Axicon Auto ID" and an image of our logo. They both show quite well because the opacity of the material on which the barcode is printed is very low.

The first reflectance profile shown below demonstrates poor modulation. This example receives a score of 45% for modulation which is a grade D. The peaks of the reflectance profile represent the areas of highest reflection of incident light. The portions of the graph above the global threshold represent the spaces of the bar code. Several of the peaks hardly exceed the global threshold. The spaces need to reflect a large proportion of the incident light. In this example the substrate is translucent so much of the light travels through the areas of substrate representing the spaces without being reflected. This is worse in the narrow spaces. The solution is to make the substrate more opaque in the area where the bar code is printed, eg. by applying a "white out box". It might also help to make the bar code at a larger magnification

The second profile shows a scan of exactly the same sample but this time it has been placed over a dark background and then scanned. Naturally, the see through problem remains, but this time the whole reflectance of the barcode has gone down and the Symbol Contrast with it, which lowers the value of the global threshold but also improves the Modulation from a grade D to a grade C (55%).

Please click on the relevant link to download the Scan file and open it with the Axicon Verifier software. 

Click here to download the scan file

Click here to download the scan file


In the reflectance profile window*, you can display the modulation values of each element. When the Modulation box is ticked as the example below shows, the modulation value is indicated along the profile in light blue. We have shown the edge ( from the 16th bar to the 16th space in the barcode) that gets the lowest value for modulation. Click here to download the scan file


*As of version 2.0.20.1 of the Axicon verifier software (click here to access the download page)


4-5: The DEFECT Parameter

Definition:
Defects in the code could be unwanted small ink spots or smudges in the quiet zones or spaces, small holes in what should be a solid bar (where ink simply has not taken to the paper), or a very narrow vertical line in a bar, such as can occur when a single element of the print head of a thermal printer has failed. All these will cause non uniformity in the scan reflectance profile at the point where the scan path crosses them. This is referred to in the profile analysis as Element Reflectance Non-uniformity (ERN). 

A spot of ink in a space would show a sudden dip in the reflectance profile where only a peak is expected. Defects in a bar, show as a peak. If this peak or dip approaches the Global Threshold, the risk of the defect being seen as an actual element and thus of the scan failing to decode, increases. As already indicated, the use of the correct measuring aperture ensures that the effect of defects is not exaggerated or underrated. The defect parameter measures the relationship of the depth of the highest peak or deepest dip to Symbol Contrast (Defects = ERNmax/SC)

Potential causes of problems:
• defective substrate (Highly recycled cardboard)
• defective print head elements (thermal printing or ink jet printing) which will tend to produce an unprinted line running through the symbol in the direction of printing. Solution: clean or replace print head 
• satellite ink droplets (ink jet printing). Solution: clean head, change ink formulation 
• haloing (flexography). Solution: adjust impression pressure and/or ink viscosity 
• incorrect matching of thermal transfer ribbons and substrate (poor adhesion of ink to surface). Solution: use correct ribbon for substrate, use smoother substrate 
• measuring aperture too small. Solution: use verifier with correct aperture, e.g., 0.15 mm (6 mills) for EAN/UPC symbols 
• Defects can also be located in the quiet zones, particularly when the margin is too short, but the colour of the substrate outside the margin is still light enough to create a difference in the reflectance but not  big enough to go below the global threshold and thus be treated as a defect and not a quiet zone violation. See example below.

Case Studies:
In the first example, the sample is a barcode printed on corrugated cardboard. The cardboard itself is full of smudges and defects, also the ink has splattered or has been unevenly layed creating some light zones in the bars and dark ones in the spaces. The image is a close up of the barcode. The reflectance profile shows many ERN (Element Reflectance Non uniformity), the ERN max is identified on the left hand side of the profile, its height is roughly 23% which reported to the 82% Symbol Contrast gives us a 28% defect, hence a D grade.

The second reflectance profile is a case where the defect is found in the left light margin. Surely this is because the light margin was too short, but the change of colour in the background is not large enough to create a margin violation. This is still classified as a defect.

Click here to download the scan file

Click here to download the scan file


In the reflectance profile window*, you have the option to spot the worst defect for each element. When the Defect box is ticked as the example below shows, a histogram identifies along the profile the value of the highest defect found for each element. When the defect proves to be so high that the resulting grade is below the minimum pass grade, the tower is coloured in red, otherwise the towers are coloured in green. Here there is a substantial defect within the 17th space from the left of the barcode. Click here to download the scan file


*As of version 2.0.20.1 of the Axicon verifier software (click here to access the download page)

4-6: The DECODABILITY Parameter

Definition:
Although a fairly easy concept in principle, Decodability is harder to explain in a few words. Decodability relates to how easily a decoder can determine what the characters in a barcode are, taking into account the individual bar and space deviation from the ideal dimensions. Poor decodability grades are always a result of poor dimensional accuracy.

However, it only applies to those measurements needed by the decode algorithm to determine the width of an element, or the combined widths of elements, in order to decode the symbol character. Taking a simple case, if it is a question of determining a particular width, the decode algorithm might say something like "If the measurement is between 2.5 modules and 3.5 modules, treat it as equal to three modules." In other words, 2.5 modules is the threshold value between two modules and three modules, and 3.5 modules is the upper threshold between three and four modules; there is a 0.5 module margin on either side of the nominal measurement of 3.0. Decodability measures how much of this margin is left in the worst (most deviating) measurement: assume the measurement is 2.7 modules, then only 0.2 is left between the actual measurement and the 2.5 threshold, out of the total margin of 0.5, so the Decodability value is 0.2/0.5, which is 40%. The lower the Decodability, the harder it will be for a decoder to decode the symbol. Some symbologies have particular features which require a more complex Decodability calculation.

If low grades are achieved it may not be immediately obvious what the fault is or where it may lie. However, if a low grade is achieved for decodability, the first item to check is the figure for the average bar gain. If it is close to or outside the allowed tolerance this will almost certainly cause poor Decodability. 

Even if the average bar gain is well within the tolerance level, it could still be affecting the decodability, as it is possible that bar gain is only happening on one side of the code. This could occur if more pressure is being placed on one part of the print head/print plate than the other and should be adjusted accordingly, either by evening pressure or by changing the orientation of the code. 

Check the other parameters to see if any other grades are also poor. In particular, poor Modulation can have a large effect on the measured dimensions of bars and spaces, and therefore on Decodability. If all other grades are good, it may simply be that the origination of some of the individual bar and space dimensions is not ideal; e.g. if the resolution of your printer is not adequate for that size of barcode. 

Potential causes of problems:
• Bar width gain/loss (systematic). Solutions: Apply correct bar width adjustment when originating symbol; adjust press settings. 
• Element width gain/loss (non-systematic). Solutions: Correct missing pixels (burnt-out print head elements, blocked ink-jet nozzles); rectify cause of defects. 
• Distortion of symbol (uneven stretching of flexographic plate; non-linear disproportioning in plate-making process). Solutions: Print symbol with height of bars parallel to direction of printing; do not disproportion bar code image in plate-making. 
• Rescaling of digitally originated images. Solutions: Ensure symbol is created in correct size; ensure software matches module widths to integer number of pixels after all adjustments. 
• Irregular element edges (ink-jet, photogravure, screen process printing). Solutions: Change print technology; increase X dimension/magnification factor; re-orientate symbol relative to cylinder engraving angle/screen mesh. 

Comments:

1/ The Dimensional Analysis window

More details of how the decodability grade is made up are available from the Dimensional Analysis Window. Indeed this window gives all the details of the elements decodability calculation, an histogram diagram represents the elements individual decodability value (the worst one is then chosen as the scan decodability value to work out the grade), with a colour coding (green when above standard, red when below standard), and the elements width calculations for all elements of the barcode, as per the symbology decode algorithm. See an exemple of the Dimensional Analysis Window of an EAN-13 barcode below. In the representation of the barcode, the blue area represents the element with the worst decodability value.


The bottom pane of the dimensional analysis window shows the element deviations for each character, as used to calculate the decodability. Clicking in this pane will highlight the associated bars in the graphical display of the code. You can also step through the characters using the up and down-arrow keys. 

The leftmost column always displays the decoded character, and the next column shows the decodability of that character. This field is coloured according to whether the decodability falls below the pass grade. 

The contents of the remaining columns depend on the symbology of the bar code. There will be a column for each of the measurements used in calculating the decodability. The possible column headings and their meanings are: 

For each measurement, three values are displayed: 
MW: The width measured from the actual bars and spaces of the code 
CW: The Calculated (perfect) width 
Dev: The deviation of the measured from the calculated width 

The dimensions in the table will be displayed in either microns or ten-thousandths of an inch (depending on the measurement units chosen in the Setup configuration). 

2/ For an EAN/UPC barcode (as in the example of an EAN-13 barcode above) the edge to edge calculations are shown in the diagram below, where e1 and e2 represent the values taken into consideration to decode the barcode, as well as b1+b2 for some characters. S is the width of the character.

3/ There is a very specific case which can occur with EAN/UPC barcodes, where the conjunction of having excessive ink spread + the presence of the characters 1, 2, 7 or 8 in the code = poor decodability of these characters. Litterally, the decodability of these characters is a lot more sensitive to a high ink spread or ink reduction. The same problem will not affect other sets of characters in the barcode but will give a poor decodability grade on these specific characters.

Excessive positive bar gain (ink spread) will affect the decodability of characters: 1a, 2a, 7b, 7c, 8b, 8c
Excessive negative bar gain (ink reduction) will affect the decodability of characters: 1b, 1c, 2b, 2c, 7a, 8a

Please note that this is only true for EAN/UPC barcodes (EAN-8, EAN-13, UPC-E, UPC-A). 

Case Studies:
The barcode below presents a very important bar gain due to excessive ink spread (43%) however its decodability is graded A. The second sample has also substantial ink spread (30%) but there, due to the presence of the characters 2a, 7b, 8b, 7c and 8c, that are so sensitive to ink spread, the decodability is very poor and gets a grade D. SO depending on the structure of the barcode, the same quality problem (major ink spread) will have different effects (Pass/Fail).

Click here to download the scan file

   

Click here to download the scan file

 

4-7: The DECODE Parameter

Definition:
The first step in analysing the profile, after identifying the bar and space regions in the profile and determining the position of each element edge, is to apply the reference decode algorithm - the set of rules/steps for decoding a symbol defined in the symbology specification - to the elements "seen" in the scan reflectance profile. If a valid decode results, the decode parameter passes and is given grade 4, otherwise it fails (grade 0). If the wrong number of elements is seen, the decode clearly fails. Note that in the ANSI standards this last case is graded separately as an "edge determination" failure, although the final effect on the profile grade is the same. 

It also applies other checks to ensure that the bar code does not break any other rules laid down for codes of that symbology, including:

  • Light margin checking
  • Check digits (where they are mandatory)
  • Structure of the code (correct start/stop characters etc.)

This results in a decode grade of either 4 (A) or 0 (F). If a code is assigned a decode grade of 0, the "Scan" tab, at the top of the Details window will describe in more detail the reason for the failure.

Potential causes of problems:
• Symbol incorrectly encoded. Solutions: Re-originate symbol; over-label with correctly encoded symbol 
• Check digit incorrectly calculated. Solutions: Correct software error in origination system; re-originate symbol; over-label with correctly calculated symbol 
• Light margin infringement. Solutions: Ensure enough room is left on both sides of the code to guarantee the non violation of the margins.
• Too many elements detected due to defects. Solutions: Correct cause of defects; adjust press (relief printing processes) to reduce haloing; replace print head (thermal/ink-jet printing) 
• Too few elements detected (failure to cross Global Threshold). Solutions: (as for Edge Contrast) 
• Negative barcode, where a light colour is used for the bars printed on a dark background. Solutions, change bar and background colours.

Comments

1/ The ‘Encodation’ tab of the Detail Window displays the full encoded number including start and stop characters, subset information, and other non-data characters. This can be useful when producing EAN/UCC-128, as it allows you to check which subset the barcode has been produced in.

2/ When the decode grade is an F, then the ‘Scan’ tab displays the reason for failing the Decode grade. In the 3rd case study below, the reason for failing the grade is: "Decode algorithm failed".

Case Studies:

1/This barcode gets an F grade for Decode. On a 10 scan average 8 scans were found with a violation of the light margin on the right of the barcode. This can really affect readability of the barcode.

Click here to download the scan file

 


2/ On the example below, the barcode is not scannable at all, indeed there is a bar missing, so the decode algorithm wil fail automatically.

 


3/ This next case is an example of a barcode where the decode algorithm fails because as we see on the reflectance profile below, many peaks do not reach over the global threshold.

Click here to download the scan file

  

  

 

 

5. The remaining Axicon Verifier software windows

In the previous chapters, we have introduced the "Summary", the "Reflectance Profile", the "Details" and the "Decodability" windows, which are the main sources of information to understand the verification results. But it is also important that we now review the remaining four display windows of the verifier. The "Command", the "Pass/Fail", the 'Traditional Analysis" windows and finally the "Set up" windows.

5-1: The COMMAND window

The Command window contains pull-down menus and toolbar buttons to access all of the features of the verifier. Almost all the features are available from both the menus and the buttons, and many are also accessible from the keyboard. 

5.1.1 The "File" menu

Load 
Reloads data previously saved with 'Save Data' from hard or floppy disk. Note: when loading the data, you do not need to have the same model or type of verifier connected as when the scan was saved.
Save
Saves all the details of the current scan to an 'Axicon Verifier Saved Scan' (.scn) file. This allows you to
  • investigate the detail of each scan at a later time
  • keep a complete record of verification results
  • send saved scans by email or floppy disk for assistance with interpretation of the results. Axicon and most Axicon distributors offer this as a chargeable service.

Also, unlike the storage of results in text or CSV files, saved information is less susceptible to tampering, making this a more reliable source of data.
Save Text
Saves the results as text files to the directory of your choice. On clicking the 'Save Text' button you will be asked to name the file and where you want to store it. Results are saved as standard text files and can be opened and printed using any Windows word processor or Windows Notepad/Wordpad
Write to CSV
Appends the results in CSV format to the file specified in the Setup dialog - Logging tab - CSV file filename. Results saved to CSV text files can be viewed and/or printed using any spreadsheet package. Please note that to use this option you should have ticked the box next to the 'CSV Export' line at time of installation, where you will have been prompted to enter your password (found in the front of your manual under the heading 'Text/CSV file'). If you did not do this then you can enter the password now by clicking the 'Write CSV' button.

You can automatically save your results to the CSV file by entering the Setup dialog, and clicking on 'Enable Auto Save' under the CSV option on the Logging tab. The verifier will then save the results of every set of scans to the chosen CSV file. (PC-x010/PC-x015 only)

Printer Setup
This button allows you to define printer options and paper size. The Axicon PC Verifier can use any Windows printer, dot-matrix, ink-jet, laser, thermal transfer etc. Having verified a barcode, you can print out the verification results by clicking the "Print" button.
Print
Once you have collected your results, you can click on this button to print a verification report on any Windows printer. The report will be automatically scaled to the available paper size.

The Axicon PC Verifier can use any printer for which a Windows printer driver is available (including thermal, thermal transfer, etc.), thus allowing you to output verification reports directly onto self-adhesive label stock for applying to the product or the paperwork.

You can configure options relating to printing with the "Printing" tab of the Setup dialog.

Exit
Closes all windows and exits from the verifier program

5.1.2 The "Edit" menu

Last Scan
Shows the number of the last scan taken.
Delete
Deletes the current scan data. Useful for removing bad or misread scans.
Clear
Clears all data from the current set of scans, and sets the verifier ready to check the next code.
Previous Scan
Shows the number of the last scan taken.
Next Scan
Shows the number of the last scan taken.

5.1.3 The "View" menu

Summary
 Displays the Summary Window.
Details Displays the CEN/ANSI details window.
Reflectance Profile Displays the Scan Reflectance Profile graph.
Pass/Fail
Displays the Pass/Fail window
Dimensional analysis Displays the dimensional analysis Screen
Traditional Analysis: Displays the traditional Analysis results

Save Positions: This option allows you to save the positions of all displayed screens so that every time you start the software they are displayed as they were when you saved. By default only the Command and the Summary screens are automatically displayed when you start the programme.

5.1.4 The "Option" menu

Used to calibrate the hardware. See Calibrating the Hardware.

Calibrate
Click here to perform the user calibration.
Reset Reader
Resets hardware. Click on this button when changing between verifiers whilst leaving the program loaded. It is also recommended that you try this if you do not receive a response from the hardware when verifying a code.
Show reader Info
Displays the Reader Info dialog, which shows information about the reader currently in use, such as the firmware version or the date of the last calibration and allows you to choose between the readers connected to your computer.
Setup Screen
Displays the setup screen

5.1.1 The "Help" menu
Contents
Shows a list of contents for the help files.
Search for Help on...
Type in your desired word to search the help files for relevant topics.
About...
Displays information about the software, including the version number.

Comments:
1/ The summary screen also displays, at the bottom, the serial number of the verifier that is currently active. If no reader has been detected, then " 0 reader found" will be displayed instead.

5-2: The PASS/FAIL window

To display the Pass/Fail Window, select "Pass/Fail" from the "View" menu in the Command Window.

The Pass/Fail window displays a simple indication of whether your code has passed or failed certain verification criteria. The information displayed is very limited but can be favoured in cases where the operator is not supposed to carry any interpretation of the results other than checking if the barcode has passed or failed the verification. This window contains several panes, each of which shows a red, orange or green background indicating a simple pass or fail. 

  • The uppermost pane shows the decoded number. Next, the results of all the Data Content Analysis plugins are listed

  • The next pane indicates if there is a problem with the bar code that is not directly included in the CEN/ANSI/ISO grade calculation, including:

    Data Content 
    Magnification 
    Wide/Narrow Ratio 
    Print Gain 
    This pane will only become visible if there is a problem with one or more of these factors. 

  • The central pane displays the grade achieved by the code, along with the required pass grade. The required pass grade is set from the General tab of the Setup dialog. If the "Apply EAN/UCC Gen. Spec" setting is ticked, the pass grade chosen will be that specified in the general EAN/UCC specifications for retail codes where applicable. Otherwise, the "Lowest Pass" value is used. 

  • Below this, the "Margins" pane indicates if there is a light margin infringement in any of the scans currently averaged. If there is, it will show an error, and indicate the scan number(s) causing the problem, and whether the infringement is of the left or right margin. 

5-3: The TRADITIONAL ANALYSIS window

To display the traditional verification results, select "Traditional Analysis" from the "View" menu  in the Command Window.

The "Traditional" method of verification has now largely been superseded by the ISO/ANSI methods, which look at the code in an entirely different way and incorporate many more parameters, to account more for the actual way a reader scans a barcode and emphasise the scanability of a barcode than its sheer print quality.

However, because “traditional” verification measures factors like average bar width deviation, which can provide a valuable indicator of ink-spread, the Axicon Verifier software offers both Traditional and ISO/ANSI verification results. 

The "Traditional Analysis" window contains three panes. 

  • The uppermost pane displays a series of "lamps" to indicate any bar growth or loss. 
    Left red = Too narrow (out of specification) 
    Left amber = Too narrow (warning) 
    Green = Good (within specification) 
    Right amber = Too wide (warning) 
    Right red = Too wide (out of specification) 

  • The middle pane displays several pieces of information. It will show "Pass" and the pass colour if all traditional parameters are within the allowed range; otherwise, it will show "Fail" and the fail colour, along with an indication of the reason for failure. It also displays the Print Contrast Signal (PCS), both as an average of all scans and of the current scan only. Finally, it shows the average bar gain, both as a percentage of the narrow bar width and (if available) as an absolute amount. 

  • The bottom-most pane displays the deviations of the dimensions of individual bars and spaces in the code from their nominal values. 

5-4: The SETUP windows

To display the Setup dialog, choose "Setup" from the "Options" menu of the command window, or click the Setup button in the command window, or press the 'F5' key. The Setup dialog contains seven tabs as follows: 

5.4.1: General

 



Allows you to select the following options: 

Standards
Whether results are displayed using the CEN or ANSI grading system. 
If CEN is selected, grades will be displayed from a low of 0 to a high of 4. If ANSI is selected, grades will be displayed from a low of F to a high of A, with the CEN grade in brackets. For more information on CEN/ANSI standards, see Interpretation of Results. 

Pass Grade. Apply GS1 Gen. Spec./ Lowest Pass for other codes.
If you are verifying codes for use in the retail supply chain, this box should always be left ticked. It sets the verifier to conform to the GS1 General Specification for EAN.UPC, ITF-14 and EAN-128 bar codes. In particular, it overrides the 'Lowest Pass' 'Verify ITF Check Digit' and some other settings. 

Apply lowest Pass Grade to GenSpec
This option is for users that want to apply a more stringent lowest pass grade than the one specified in the Genspec. This is only relevant to GS1 symbologies though. The new pass grade is to be set in the Pass Grade box above.

Lowest Pass (Other Codes) 
Enter your lowest acceptable pass grade for non-retail codes. Under the ANSI, CEN and ISO methods of verification there is no such thing as a pass or fail grade - simply a quality assessment grade from 4 (A) to 0 (F). You should check with your customer for their specific grade requirements. 

EAN/UPC magnification factor

This is reserved for users of our PC5000 series. Measure your bar code using the scale rule provided and enter the magnification factor here. The box labelled ‘Ask every scan’ should be automatically ticked. Untick if you know all your codes have the same magnification factor e.g. 100%. 

Units
When this is set to 'Default', the verifier will display its results using the measurement units currently selected in the Windows Regional Settings control panel. The other two settings of this control will over-ride the Windows setting. 

5.4.2 Check Characters


Allows you to select the following options: 

ITF check digit checking (Modulo-10) 
Code 39 check character checking (Modulo-43) 
Codabar check character checking (Modulo-16) 
Note: EAN/UPC, ITF-14, wCode 128 and UPC/EAN128, RSS, MSI Plessey (modulo-10) and Code 93 symbol check digits are always verified, as they are a mandatory part of the barcode. 


5.4.3 Appearance


Allows you to change the colours used to denote codes which have passed or failed your chosen pass grade. Click on the appropriate box, and select a colour. 

You also have the option of adding an audible warning for passing and failing codes. Click the approriate button and select any ‘.wav’ file. 

The warning colour and sound are used when the overall grade is within 0.5 of the pass grade. In this case, it is likely that at least one scan of a set of scans being averaged has fallen below the pass grade. 

"Custom Pass/Fail Display" is only of use if you have to follow Target Retail Stores quality control procedures, which require the three panes of the "Pass/Fail" window to appear in a different order. 


5.4.4 Printing


Print Command
This setting allows you to choose what is printed when the 'Print' command is chosen from the Command window 
Report Options
'Auto Print' will cause the software to automatically print out a verification report on completing the set number of scans for each barcode. Auto Print will automatically send the data to the Windows default printer, and not ask you to select a printer. You should ensure that the default printer is available when using this feature. 

'Use Smaller Font' will cause verification reports to be printed using a smaller font. This may be useful if fields on the printout are over-running the space allotted to them. 

'Print Header' is the text which appears at the top of the printed report. To revert to the default text, clear this field. 

Graph Options
Check ‘Print graph in black and white’ if the Static Reflectance Profile graph does not print correctly on a monochrome printer. There is a bug in the printer driver for the HP LaserJet III under Windows NT which can cause problems printing coloured items, and this setting may improve print quality on other monochrome printers too. 

5.4.5 Logging



Allows you to select the following options; 

Auto Save Data
If enabled, every scan will automatically be saved to a file in the specified directory. The default directory is the 'Saved Scans' sub-folder of <My Documents>. If you enable Auto Save Data, but the directory chosen does not exist, you will be asked if you want to create it.
Auto-saved files can be re-opened with 'Load data' from the Command window, or by using the 'Scan File Data Extractor'. Filenames of auto-saved data files are eight characters long, and made up of the characters '0' to '9' and 'a' to 'f'.
For more information on file storage, please see "File Storage and Printing". 
Saved File Log
This allows you to run any Windows program each time a file is saved. It is intended for use with the 'Scan File Data Extractor', but could be used to perform any action on the saved file. The command in 'Log Command' will be executed each time a scan is automatically or manually saved (according to the settings of 'Log Auto Saved/Manually Saved Files), with command-line parameters as given in 'Log Parameters' ('%s' stands for the full path and name of the saved scan file). 
CSV File
‘Auto Save’ (PC-x010/x015 only)
Allows a subset of the scan information to be automatically appended to the specified file in CSV format. This feature is of limited use; we would recommend installing the 'Scan File Data Extractor' instead 
‘Save Path’ 
If ticked, stores the complete path and file name of the auto-saved data file into the CSV file, otherwise only the file name itself is saved. 


5.4.6. Calibration


Allows you to select the following options; 

Calibration file
Specifies the file and directory in which calibration data will be saved. This can be altered by clicking on the browse button and choosing the required directory and filename. 
Calibration Expiry
Checks that the verifier was last calibrated within the time period you specify, and displays a warning dialog if it has not. If "Allow scans after calibration has expired" is not ticked, no scans will be allowed until the verifier has been re-calibrated. 
Password
If the "Require Setup Password for calibration" box is ticked, when you click "OK" in the Calibration dialog, you will be required to enter the Setup password, which is set from the Advanced tab of the Setup dialog. 
Allowed Calibration Codes
This is a list of the data content of bar codes with which calibration is permitted. The default values match the codes on the "Axicon PC Verifier Calibration Sheet". You can permit any bar code to be used as a calibration code by unticking "Enforce". 

5.4.7. Plugins


Allows you to configure plugin data content options where necessary. Results from plugins are displayed as a tab in the Summary window when an appropriate code is scanned. 

See the section Standard Plugins for a list of the plugin features that are installed as standard. 

To enable a plugin, make sure the box next to its name is ticked. To disable a plugin, untick the box. When a plugin is first installed, it will automatically be enabled. 

To configure a plugin, select it in the list to the left and click the 'Configure' button. If the selected plugin has no configurable features, the button will be disabled. 

Supplied plugins that have configurable options are: 

Jobref: Allows you to configure the job reference, which will give you the option of entering a default job reference, and will also ask if you want to be prompted to enter a job reference after every scan. 
Lookup: More information on configuring Product Look-up can be found in the Product Lookup section. 
If the selected plugin is password-protected, you can enter the password for the current reader by pressing the "Password" button. This button is disabled for non-protected plugins. As standard, EAN-128 and Product Lookup require entry of a password. 


5.4.8 Advanced


Allows you to select the following options; 

Action following a non-decode of a scan. 

Password protection of Setup settings - this is useful for ensuring features such as the Pass/Fail grade and file saving directories can only be altered by an authorised user. To apply a setup password, enter it in the "Password for Setup" box and click "OK". You will be asked to re-enter the password you gave. Now, to alter the settings you must enter the same password into the "Password for Setup" again before you click OK. 


DISCLAIMER 
This document is intended as a recommendation of work practices sponsored by Axicon Auto ID Ltd. Whilst this document is believed to contain correct information, neither Axicon Auto ID Ltd nor any of it’s associated companies, nor any of it’s employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of such information that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute nor imply Axicon Auto ID Ltd endorsement nor recommendation. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of Axicon Auto ID Ltd.


Go to the top of the page  -  Go Back to the Main Menu